“Paul, the Woman-hater?”
1 Timothy 2:8-15
Study #4 in 1 Timothy Series
INTRODUCTION:
I am not a prophet, nor the son of a prophet, but I am going to make a prophecy. Before this day is over you men are going to pat me on the back and say, “Mike, you are either one of the bravest men I have ever met, or else one of the stupidest.” And you ladies will be looking at me as if I were an axe-murderer, or as if I had done something unmentionable in public!
I am about to go where no Bible teacher wants to go. I am about to plunge into a biblical text… and Lord, please forgive me… that I could wish were not in the Bible! However, it is in the Bible, and in fact, it is smack dab in the middle of our study of 1 Timothy, so I just do not see any way around it.
TRANSITION:
We live in a time when any discussion of gender roles is met with predictable hostility. In fact, just the use of that term, “gender roles,” is enough to send some people, women and men, over the edge because they insist that that whole concept is chauvinist, misogynist, patriarchal, and totally passé.
The problem for us who are Christians is that the Bible runs counter to our culture on this matter. That should not surprise us though, because it runs counter to nearly every human philosophy, anytime, anyplace. And even if what the Bible says makes us cringe, and cramps our style, we owe it to God, ourselves, and our church to pay attention to it, and to bring our thinking and practice into conformity with it, or else we should stop calling ourselves “Christians.”
On the subject that we will be addressing in this study you need to know that there is some variation even between conservative, evangelical scholars of both genders. You also need to know that we are not going to end the debate because of my stunning treatment of this passage, as wonderful as it may turn out to be. Also, know that this discussion is not going away anytime soon. And when I get done you may be more confused than you are right now, and for that I apologize in advance.
NOTES on the Text:
Verse 8: Therefore, I want the
men in every place to pray, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and
dissension.
- “Therefore.” Anytime we find this word we need to stop
and figure out what it is “there for.” It always functions
like a hinge, logically linking what has just been said with what is about
to be stated. So, we need to look back at the preceding argument. In this
context Paul has been talking about the importance of prayer. That is how
he began this chapter, reminding Timothy that prayer should be offered up
constantly on behalf of all men, including kings and all who are in
authority. Then he narrows this down to point out the importance of prayer
in all aspects of ministry, especially in evangelism. In verses 2:4-7 Paul
talks about God’s desire to save sinners. But for that to happen Paul says
they must deal with the Mediator, Jesus Christ. He came to give His life
as a ransom for sinners and to provide a bridge to God. Then in verse 7
Paul tells us that this was exactly the message that was entrusted unto
him by the Risen Christ, that he should carry the message to the Gentiles
so that they could be saved. He says that he was appointed as a preacher,
and as an apostle, and as a teacher of the Truth. Why? It is all about the
salvation of priceless souls for whom Christ died. Everything is about
winning lost people to Jesus!
- Now look again at verse 8. “Therefore, I want the men in every place to
pray, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and dissension.”
Paul writes this to Timothy who was pastoring in Ephesus at the time, a
church that had more than its share of wrath and dissension, and that was
affecting the church’s outreach in a negative way. No church wracked by
sin and anger and arguing is going to be effective in spreading the
Gospel. That is a fact! But what is the cure for wrath and dissension? PRAYER
– lots and lots of prayer!
- One more thing before we move on… Up in verse 4 where he says that “God wants all men to be saved,” Paul uses the word that is non-gender exclusive. It means humankind and includes both males and females equally. However, here in verse 8 he changes and uses the Greek word for “males,” “men” specifically. Why does he do that? Let’s move on and see if we can figure it out.
Verses 9-10: Likewise, I want women
to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with
braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments, 10 but
rather by means of good works, as is proper for women making a claim to
godliness.
- So now, in the very same context,
with the very same thought in mind, Paul addresses the women of the
church. And he uses the Greek word that is specific to the female gender. He
has already spoken about the Christian men of the church needing to
exhibit by their behavior the holiness that they claim to possess. Now he
takes up the related subject of what genuine holiness looks like in
Christian women of the First Century church.
- First, notice that in verse 9 the
subject is not clothing (outward apparel), but inner beauty
that exceeds the outer beauty that many women (and men) prize so highly.
- The word “likewise” applies to the
women what has already been said about the men, namely that their lives,
too, should be characterized by prayer and devotion to the Gospel.
- These two verses are very similar
to what we find in 1 Peter 3:3-5, “Your adornment must not be merely
external—braiding the hair, and wearing gold jewelry, or putting on
dresses; 4 but let it be the hidden person of the heart,
with the imperishable quality of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is
precious in the sight of God. 5 For
in this way in former times the holy women also, who hoped in God, used to
adorn themselves, being submissive to their own husbands.”
It is important to note that neither Peter nor Paul is saying that there
is anything wrong with a woman using jewelry, makeup, pretty hairstyles,
and lovely clothing to enhance her natural beauty. But both apostles are
reminding Christian women that no amount of paint and hardware can hide
bad character. As Christian men and women, our primary focus should
always be on the inner qualities of godliness rather than on the outward
qualities of style and fashion. So far so good! I think everyone can agree
with that.
- But there is something else here, too, and that is the cultural/historical context. In many, if not most of the early pagan religions, including the Diana worship so prevalent in Ephesus where Timothy lived, women played a prominent role. For example, the worship of Aphrodite at Corinth was probably one of the most immoral in which temple prostitution was made into a religion. In all the mystery religions there were priestesses, and I believe that it is because of these common heathen practices that Paul is emphasizing that sexuality is not to enter the public prayer or worship in the services of the Christian churches. He says that when a woman is going to sing in church, to speak or pray or to have any part in a church service, she ought to keep in mind that her appeal should in no way be based on sex. She should seek to please God, and there is no way in which she can appeal to Him based on sex at all. Such appeal always characterized the pagan religions in the Roman world, and Paul is stressing that it should never be a part of Christian worship.
Verse 11: A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire
submissiveness.
- Oh boy, now we are into it! So, let’s check the KJV. Maybe that sounds better: “Let the women learn in silence with all subjection.” Oh no, that is even worse! So, what in the world are we supposed to do with this verse, or the one that follows it?
Verse 12: But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority
over a man, but to remain quiet. [i.e., in church services]
- First, I think that verses 11-12 must
be looked at together because they form one thought in Paul’s mind. But
what is that exactly? Well again, I believe that in this whole section
Paul is dealing with the subject of “public worship” and what goes
on in the public worship service of the local church. I believe that
starting in verse 8 he is dealing with the conduct and appearance of those
who are leading public worship. Some have concluded from these verses that
Paul forbade women to speak or pray in church, but that is not true,
because women praying in church is clearly implied in verse 9 and stated
as fact in 1 Corinthians 11:5 so this cannot be a blanket prohibition. Rather,
the point is that both men and women when involved in public worship
should take care to dress modestly and appropriately, and not put on
extravagant clothes that draw attention to themselves.
- But in these two verses Paul is
talking about the learning and teaching of doctrine. He places this
responsibility squarely on the shoulders of a select group of uniquely
qualified males. Not all males, mind you, but some males. Most of the
men were under the same injunction as the women; namely to learn in quiet
submission.
- “I do not allow a
woman to teach or exercise authority over a man.” Some believe that Paul here prohibited only the uninstructed women
of Ephesus from teaching. Other scholars see this as a general restriction
for every church; that women are not to be official teachers in the
assembled church. This later position is further buttressed by the phrase
that follows, “…or exercise authority over a
man.” [i.e.,
functioning in the role of overseer]
- In this egalitarian age we live in that
idea does not go down very well, does it? According to our modern way of
thinking we like to say that everyone is equal in every way, and everyone,
men, and women alike, should have the same roles, privileges, and
responsibilities. That idea is called “egalitarianism.” Unfortunately, God
did not receive that memo! Remember earlier I said that as Christians, we
need to accept the revealed Word of God, even when it chafes and cramps
our style and clashes with our preconceived ideas? Well, this is one of
those times.
- We must decide if we are going to agree that God knows what He is doing, even if we do not like it or even understand it, OR, if we are going to reject the Scriptures and rewrite them to please ourselves.
Verse 13: For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve.
- As support for his position Paul refers to God’s order of creation as described in Genesis 2:7-25. Adam was made before Eve, and thus has the privilege of the firstborn, a concept well accepted and understood by all ancient societies. Paul views the man-woman relationship set forth in this passage as grounded in the order of Creation. Of course, being made first does not make men superior to women in any way, but it does carry privilege to which we as modern people find it hard to relate.
Verse 14: And it was not Adam who
was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.
- Here Paul gives his second
argument for men carrying the lead in public worship, and that has to
do with The Fall, way back in the Garden of Eden. According to the
Scriptures it was Eve who was deceived, not Adam. In fact, we know that
Adam sinned with his eyes wide open. According to Romans 5:12 he knew
exactly what he was doing. “So,” you ask, “does
that make Adam better?” NO, of course not, and Paul is not saying
that either.
- He does, however, seem to argue
that since the woman was deceived and then led Adam astray, she is not to
be entrusted with the teaching function of an overseer (elder) in the
public worship services of the assembled church.
- Again, nowadays lots of self-proclaimed “Christians” have jettisoned this view as misogynist, patriarchal, and out-of-touch with the modern world. For that reason, everywhere you look you will find women pastors, women preachers, women elders, and women evangelists. They insist that Paul was wrong and misguided, a product of his times. They say, “Surely God did not mean to communicate what Paul said. Somehow Paul went off the reservation there for a minute and just threw in a little of his own patriarchal bias.” However, I do not think so. My view of the Inspiration of Scripture does not allow me to pass judgment that way. I believe that Paul was being led by the Spirit of God to write this, even though I do not fully understand all the reasons behind it.
Verse 15: But women will be preserved through [he
uses the Greek preposition διά with the genitive case meaning through,
or by instrumentality of] the bearing of
children if they continue in faith and love and sanctity with self-restraint.
- This is the last verse, but things
are not getting any easier! What in the world does this mean? Three
possible answers have been put forth over the years:
1.
Some
have postulated that it speaks of the godly woman finding fulfilment in her
role as wife and mother in the home. However, even in that day not all
women were wives or mothers. So, are childless women just left out entirely? I
do not think this is what Paul was talking about.
2.
Others
say that it refers to women being kept physically safe in childbirth.
But wait a minute. Even in those days lots of women died in childbirth, even
Christian women. So, what kind of a promise is that if it does not seem to hold
up under closer examination?
3.
Still
others say that it refers to women being saved spiritually through the most
significant birth of all, the birth of Jesus Christ, born of the Virgin Mary.
For me, this is the best explanation of the three, and seems to me to make the
most sense. I think that Paul is here referring to Genesis 3:15-16 to point to
the Incarnation of Christ, the Savior of the World. Salvation came to the world
through one special childbirth.
- Dr. J. Vernon McGee, in his commentary on 1 Timothy, agrees with me. He writes: “It was the sin of Eve that brought sin into the world. Now every time a woman bears a child, she brings a sinner into the world—that is all she can bring into the world. But Mary brought the Lord Jesus, the Savior into the world. So how are women saved? By childbearing—because Mary brought the Savior into the world. Don’t ever say that woman brought sin into the world, unless you are prepared to add that woman also brought the Savior into the world. My friend, no man provided a Savior: a woman did. However, each individual woman is saved by faith, the same as each man is saved by faith. She is to grow in love and holiness just as a man is.”
CONCLUSION:
So,
here is the deal… we should not read this passage as a barrier to women working
and serving in the Church. Paul was not a member the of “He-Man Women-Haters
Club.” While it is true that the woman was created second, and that it was the
woman who fell into sin due to the seduction of the serpent, yet…
·
It
was Mary of Nazareth who bore and who trained the child Jesus.
·
It
was Mary of Magdala who was the first to see the Risen Lord.
·
It
was four women, who of all the disciples, stood by the cross.
·
Priscilla
with her husband Aquila was a valued teacher in the early Church, a teacher who
led Apollos to a fuller knowledge of the truth (Acts 18:16).
·
Euodia
and Syntyche, despite their quarrel, were women “who labored in the Gospel”
(Phil. 4:2-3).
·
Philip,
the evangelist, had four daughters who were prophetesses (Acts 21:9).
·
The
aged women were commanded to teach the younger women (Titus 2:3).
·
Paul
held Lois and Eunice, Timothy’s mother, and grandmother, in the highest honor
(2 Timothy 1:5).
·
And
there are many women’s names held in honor in Romans 16.
· Then, of course, there is Paul’s own statement found in Galatians 3:26-28, “So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
I urge you not to go off half-cocked, like so many have done, and conclude that Paul was just wrong about this subject. You do that to your own peril. God’s Word is God’s Word, whether we like it or not! I confess that I do not fully understand all the reasoning behind this teaching, but despite that, it is my understanding that in the church there are some roles and some duties that are for certain chosen men to carry out. To arrive at any other conclusion, I must do injury to the text to try and make it conform to my modern ideas rather than simply accept it and submit to it.